LVCARDS MicroSD 32GB Cards
For the cluster computing project I’m working on, I need 28 microSD cards. There was an AliExpress sale with good reviews, so I ordered a batch of 30 microSD cards, and at a great price point at the time. As long as the cards are Class 10 and work then we should be good, right?
Let’s see how my batch of LV Card (labeled “LVCARDS”) microSD cards perform…
Testing the Cards – H2testw
Disappointingly, more than half the cards are damaged, defective or fake1. It took days to test every last one of them with H2testw. The cases with the “✘” are corrupted, fake, deathly slow, or otherwise unusable. The cases with an “✔” passed the H2testw test – data could be safely written to the disk and verified afterward. All tests are done with a brand-name USB 3.0 microSD adapter.
Here are screenshots from H2testw. All the “✘” cards follow a similar result to the tests below.
Deceptive or Just Defective?
Deceptive, fake as a three-dollar bill. Why can I confidently say fake? Let’s look at the results screenshot below. There is the message “488.8 MByte aliased memory”. That means that the real memory is reused when writing past the end of that memory boundary, which looks to be 13.5 GB, so newer data silently and deceptively overwrites existing data. The card cannot be fully tested as the read speed drops off the face of the Earth.
Also, look at the write speed of about 20 MB/s. Amazing isn’t it? That is 2x better than the minimum Class 10 sustained write speed. An impressive illusion.
Having tested all of the “✘” cards, here is a progress animation of H2testw trying to verify one card for over 19 hours. The read speed falls and falls. I suspect this is a cheat mechanism to prevent cards from being fully tested.
No Refund or Replacements
Sadly, GAOMUYU EStore on AliExpress doesn’t respond to messages at all. Even worse, when I first received these cards, I tested two cards in the batch and they passed H2testw – (Un)lucky me. Each test took about an hour, so I assumed the rest of the cards would work as well and didn’t test them – remember, it would take days to test all the cards if they all worked. I left a nice review and time went on. It wasn’t until my AliExpress two-week review period had well expired that I discovered half the cards are corrupt or fake. The seller still does not respond to messages.
There is a saying: “A cheap person pays twice”.
The Working LVCARDS MicroSD Cards
On the other hand, here is what one of the working “✔” LVCARDS comes back with under H2testw:
That’s what a bottom-end Class 10 write speed should be, but what about random read/write speeds?
CrystalDiskMark Speed Tests
Next, let’s run CrystalDiskMark on the same working LVCARDS card in the results screenshot above. Here are the results:
Can you imagine using this microSD card to hold a Linux OS but has a write speed on the order of kilobytes per second? Let’s do just that next…
Phoronix Test Suite Async IO Tests – LVCARDS
Next, I’ll really put these cards though their paces with Phoronix Test Suite AIO stress test. It took a long time to install Ubuntu Bionic,
apt update && apt upgrade, and add the Phoronix Test Suite on the same LVCARDS card above. It took even longer to run a simple test. Here are the agonizing results:
System Information PROCESSOR: AArch64 rev 4 @ 1.15GHz Core Count: 4 Scaling Driver: cpufreq-sunxi interactive MOTHERBOARD: sun50iw1p1 MEMORY: 2048MB DISK: 32GB N/A File-System: ext4 Mount Options: data=ordered noatime rw stripe=1024 OPERATING SYSTEM: Ubuntu 18.04 Kernel: 3.10.105-bsp-1.2-ayufan-136 (aarch64) Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 AIO-Stress 0.21: pts/aio-stress-1.1.1 [Test: Random Write] Test 1 of 1 Estimated Trial Run Count: 3 Estimated Time To Completion: 5 Minutes [13:15 UTC] Started Run 1 @ 13:10:24 Started Run 2 @ 13:34:59 Started Run 3 @ 14:01:00 Started Run 4 @ 14:30:16 * Started Run 5 @ 15:00:18 * Started Run 6 @ 15:32:08 * Started Run 7 @ 16:07:27 * Test: Random Write: 1.87 1.75 1.54 1.5 1.41 1.31 1.06 Average: 1.49 MB/s Deviation: 18.12%
This test took over three hours to run, and the average random write speed was found to be 1.49 MB/s. Excruciatingly slow.
Samsung EVO Plus MicroSD 64GB Cards
For a reference of how well reputable SD cards can perform, here are benchmarks using a Samsung EVO Plus 64GB card. This is a genuine card purchased from Samsung directly – the card is made in the Philippines, the SD adapter has “Samsung” debossed (not printed), the edge of the card is white (not mass-production black), it passed H2testw twice, and it is nearly as fast as advertised using CrystalDiskMark.
Phoronix Test Suite Async IO Tests – Samsung EVO Plus
Let’s try the same random write speed test again with the Samsung EVO card. For this test the OS was cloned to this brand-new Samsung SD card so all settings and configurations are identical.
System Information PROCESSOR: AArch64 rev 4 @ 1.15GHz Core Count: 4 Scaling Driver: cpufreq-sunxi interactive GRAPHICS: Screen: 1920x2160 MOTHERBOARD: sun50iw1p1 MEMORY: 2048MB DISK: 64GB EC2QT File-System: ext4 Mount Options: data=ordered noatime rw stripe=1024 OPERATING SYSTEM: Ubuntu 18.04 Kernel: 3.10.105-bsp-1.2-ayufan-136 (aarch64) Compiler: GCC 7.3.0 AIO-Stress 0.21: pts/aio-stress-1.1.1 [Test: Random Write] Test 1 of 1 Estimated Trial Run Count: 3 Estimated Time To Completion: 5 Minutes [20:12 UTC] Started Run 1 @ 20:07:54 Started Run 2 @ 20:18:04 Started Run 3 @ 20:28:47 Started Run 4 @ 20:39:18 * Started Run 5 @ 20:49:26 * Started Run 6 @ 21:00:32 * Started Run 7 @ 21:11:23 * Started Run 8 @ 21:22:31 * Started Run 9 @ 21:33:04 * Test: Random Write: 4.59 4.13 4.14 4.34 4.01 4.18 4.07 4.21 3.85 Average: 4.17 MB/s Deviation: 5.00%
This test took half as long – just shy of an hour and a half – but the average random write speed was found to have increased to 4.17 MB/s – 2.8x faster than the previous cards. Not amazing, but respectable for what SD cards are designed for.
- The fake cards are really 16GB or 8GB cards with doctored firmware to report 32GB ↩